![]() For me, I'm doing music and audio mixes, and Nuendo handles both well so it works great for my projects. ![]() Again, if you are a mixer or audio editor, you're going to be working in Pro Tools for the final. Steinberg Nuendo 11 is a music and audio post-production workstation software designed to provide versatile workflows, task efficiency, and integration with industry-standard tools for composers, audio editors, sound designers, and mixers, in film, television, music, game audio, VR, post-production, and immersive sound. When it comes down to it, as a composer you're going to deliver music stems to the mixers in AAF or just plain ole' wav formats anyway - so what you compose on really doesn't make a bit of difference to them, they are just going to import and place in the overall mix. But if you are a composer/producer, there are some nice features - such as (IMO) MUCH better integration with existing synth patch lists, which was always a frigging PITA with Pro Tools for me. Audio editors are going to go with Pro Tools for lots of practical reasons. Most post houses probably don't use it, simply because most post houses use Pro Tools and Avid. It's not as rare as some have made it sound in this thread. The MultiTap Delay now supports up to 7.1 surround sound. ![]() Nuendo's biggest user is Hans Zimmer, of course, but there are other LA composers who use it too. Nuendo 11 also adds many enhancements to its sound design tools. I was a Pro Tools user for many years, but the subscription thing ended it for me. ![]() I went to Cubase first, then as I wanted to get more into surround mixes I went with Nuendo. I use Nuendo, and while it has it's quirks like all of the DAWs do, it's very robust and is capable of doing pretty complex monitoring and surround stuff.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |